A Category of Discrete Closure Systems
نویسنده
چکیده
Discrete systems such as sets, monoids, groups are familiar categories. The internal strucutre of the latter two is defined by an algebraic operator. In this paper we describe the internal structure of the base set by a closure operator. We illustrate the role of such closure in convex geometries and partially ordered sets and thus suggest the wide applicability of closure systems. Next we develop the ideas of closed and complete functions over closure spaces. These can be used to establish criteria for asserting that “the closure of a functional image under f is equal to the functional image of the closure”. Functions with these properties can be treated as categorical morphisms. Finally, the category ClosureSys of closure systems is shown to be cartesian closed. 1 Closure Systems By a discrete system we mean a set of elements, points, or other phenomena which we will generically call our universe, denoted by U. Individual points of U will be denoted by lower case letters: a, b, ..., p, q, ... ∈ U. By 2, we mean the powerset on U, or collection of all subsets of U. Elements of 2 we will denote by upper case letters: S, T, X, Y, Z. A closure system, C, is any collection of subsets X, Y, . . . Z ⊆ U, including U itself, which is closed under intersection. Subsets in C are said to be closed. If U = {a, b, c, d, e} then the collection of closed sets C1 = {Ø, {a}, {b}, {ab}, {bd}, {abc}, {abd}, {abce}, {abcde}, {abcdef}} (1) is a closure system. We require the empty set Ø to be included in all closure systems; although this will not be necessary until we define direct products in the category. A closure system can equivalently be defined as (U, φ), where φ is a closure operator satisfying four axioms. For all Y, Z ⊆ U, C0: Ø.φ = Ø C1: Y ⊆ Y.φ, C2: Y ⊆ Z implies Y.φ ⊂ Z.φ, and C3: Y.φ.φ = Y.φ. By C1, U itself must be closed. Here we are using a suffix operator notation, as we will throughout this paper. Read Y.φ as “Y closure”. A set Y is closed if Y = Y.φ. It is not hard to show that these two definitions of closure are equivalent. A closure operator/system can satisfy other axioms depending on the mathematical discipline. A topological closure is closed under union, or C4: (Y ∪ Z).φ = Y.φ ∪ Z.φ. The closure operator of linear systems, often called the spanning operator, satisfies the SteinitzMacLane exchange axiom
منابع مشابه
Categories isomorphic to the category of $L$-fuzzy closure system spaces
In this paper, new definitions of $L$-fuzzy closure operator, $L$-fuzzy interior operator, $L$-fuzzy remote neighborhood system, $L$-fuzzy neighborhood system and $L$-fuzzy quasi-coincident neighborhood system are proposed. It is proved that the category of $L$-fuzzy closure spaces, the category of $L$-fuzzy interior spaces, the category of $L$-fuzzy remote neighborhood spaces, the category of ...
متن کاملCategories of lattice-valued closure (interior) operators and Alexandroff L-fuzzy topologies
Galois connection in category theory play an important role inestablish the relationships between different spatial structures. Inthis paper, we prove that there exist many interesting Galoisconnections between the category of Alexandroff $L$-fuzzytopological spaces, the category of reflexive $L$-fuzzyapproximation spaces and the category of Alexandroff $L$-fuzzyinterior (closure) spaces. This ...
متن کاملFrom torsion theories to closure operators and factorization systems
Torsion theories are here extended to categories equipped with an ideal of 'null morphisms', or equivalently a full subcategory of 'null objects'. Instances of this extension include closure operators viewed as generalised torsion theories in a 'category of pairs', and factorization systems viewed as torsion theories in a category of morphisms. The first point has essentially been treated in [15].
متن کاملON (L;M)-FUZZY CLOSURE SPACES
The aim of this paper is to introduce $(L,M)$-fuzzy closurestructure where $L$ and $M$ are strictly two-sided, commutativequantales. Firstly, we define $(L,M)$-fuzzy closure spaces and getsome relations between $(L,M)$-double fuzzy topological spaces and$(L,M)$-fuzzy closure spaces. Then, we introduce initial$(L,M)$-fuzzy closure structures and we prove that the category$(L,M)$-{bf FC} of $(L,M...
متن کاملCharacterizations of $L$-convex spaces
In this paper, the concepts of $L$-concave structures, concave $L$-interior operators and concave $L$-neighborhood systems are introduced. It is shown that the category of $L$-concave spaces and the category of concave $L$-interior spaces are isomorphic, and they are both isomorphic to the category of concave $L$-neighborhood systems whenever $L$ is a completely distributive lattice. Also, it i...
متن کامل